Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
From: "Sean Hamblett" <shamblett@charter.net>
Subject: Re: Volunteers - Topics AND Configuration
To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:46:08 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2384430@rems08.cluster1.charter.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308121339180.2280-100000@umbongo.flamefew.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Thanks,

   I wasn't sure if ConfigurationAsRegistry had been 
chosen or not, that thread has been dormant for a bit, 
hard to tell with so many topics.  Please bear with me, 
this is my fist Open Source project...

Sean

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:41:40 -0400 (EDT)
  Henri Yandell <bayard@generationjava.com> wrote:
>
>I think they should be separate. The Configuration code 
>will [I hope] be
>users of the JNDI code. It's something I've found myself 
>tending towards.
>A JNDI implementation, but I often write a simple Config 
>class around that
>JNDI back end. Simple things like:
>
>getAsString
>getAsInteger
>getAsFile
>
>etc etc, which keeps the code using the configuration a 
>bit cleaner. More
>importantly, they are separated.
>
>My belief is that other parts of the system using the 
>Configuration should
>do so through an interface. etc etc, OO OO, polywossism 
>usw.
>
>Hen
>
>On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Sean Hamblett wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am interested in Configuration, is that considered 
>>part
>> of JNDI, or has that yet to be established as its own
>> topic?  Oh yeah, a little about me, Java/J2EE Developer 
>>3
>> years with a couple years of C/C++ prior.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sean
>>
>