Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 60442 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2003 13:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 60322 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 13:48:32 -0000 Received: from umbongo.flamefew.net (64.253.103.114) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2003 13:48:32 -0000 Received: by umbongo.flamefew.net (Postfix on Linux (i386), from userid 500) id 95F331B49; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:48:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbongo.flamefew.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id 857751B3C for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:48:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:48:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Henri Yandell X-X-Sender: hen@umbongo.flamefew.net To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Suggested notation for discussions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Apologies for suggesting the same idea as Alex. Hadn't got to this point in the list of mails, so make that 2 +1's for this idea :) Hen On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Alex Blewitt wrote: > I'd recommend that when discussing technology XXX that we put [XXX] in > the subject, so that we can filter the discussions appropriately. > > For example: > > [JNDI] Blah blah blah > [EJB] Blah blah blah > [JMS] Blah blah blah > > or even > > [EJB-BMP] Blah blah blah > [EJB-CMP] Blah blah blah > > That way, it'll be easier to read what the messages are associated > with, and makes for processing the mail archives (e.g. list all 'JMS' > related messages) that much easer. > > Alex. >