Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61907 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2003 23:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61892 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2003 23:52:11 -0000 Received: from adsl-209-233-18-245.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO public.coredevelopers.net) (209.233.18.245) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2003 23:52:11 -0000 Received: from tiger (unknown [192.168.2.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by public.coredevelopers.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 334601832C for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:46:19 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jeremy Boynes" To: Subject: RE: Logging code and Garbage Collection Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:52:18 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > I'd say add it to the coding standards. Many people may not even be > aware that there is such an issue, and having things overspecified in > the coding standards is more likely to produce better results than > those which are underspecified. > Doing that now...