Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3747 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2003 09:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3733 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2003 09:41:34 -0000 Received: from smtp014.mail.yahoo.com (216.136.173.58) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2003 09:41:34 -0000 Received: from 82-35-107-109.cable.ubr06.dals.blueyonder.co.uk (HELO yahoo.co.uk) (james?strachan@82.35.107.109 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2003 09:41:45 -0000 Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 10:41:40 +0100 Subject: Re: [LEGAL] maven.xml and project.xml don't have licenses Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: James Strachan To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <947BB0D0-CFCB-11D7-870E-0003934D3EA4@ioshq.com> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N AFAIK we've never put licences in build files anywhere else in Apache (maven.xml, project.xml, build.xml). I don't see any major reasons why we'd need to - unless someone else has? On Saturday, August 16, 2003, at 10:25 am, Alex Blewitt wrote: > The main 'maven.xml' and 'project.xml' don't have any licenses inside > them. Is this intentional or an oversight? > > Alex. > > James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/