Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45369 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2003 07:05:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45217 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 07:05:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reason.planet57.com) (202.183.249.229) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2003 07:05:16 -0000 Received: from coredevelopers.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reason.planet57.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745A23556EB for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:05:44 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:05:40 +0700 Subject: Re: [general] low signal, high noise Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jason Dillon To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Its too bad, discussions of this size really warrant a more organized message system, like NNTP... but I have no idea if anyone at Apache is looking into this, or already has it implemented. NTTP is much easier to manage wrt, sub contexts as well as reduces general net traffic, as every single message is not duplicated to each subscribers mail box. --jason On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 07:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Different issue Alan. > > What I'm after are sub-lists. ie) > > geronimo-dev mail list then: > [general] or [spec] etc. > > At Jakarta Commons we have slowly managed to get the Developer list to > abide by this, though no the User list 100% of the time. Although I > [and > someone else] suggested such a thing for Geronimo, the sheer number of > people here means it's unlikely it'll manage to learn to abide by > informal > rules [my opinion from the Commons community]. > > Even if it is, the only way to make it adhere is to define a solid set > of > sub-contexts and publish these [wiki, whereever]. Or to push off > separate > lists [which damages the development of the community, but so does too > much noise]. > > For your problem, have you tried filtering on a header? That's the > preferred way. However I often find myself forgetting and filtering on > the > Reply-To. > > Hen > > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Alan Cabrera wrote: > >> I requested a similar thing in that I asked for this discussion to be >> labeled [geronimo-dev] so that I can spot it from the tons of junk >> emails >> that are sent to me and the response that I basically got was that >> it's too >> bad the my emailer sucks so bad. >> >> Regards, >> >> Alan >> OpenEJB Developer >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@generationjava.com] >>> >>> I'm not sure if others are finding this too, but I'm >>> definitely looking forward to a time when the mail list gets >>> nice and organised about either having multiple lists or >>> having an obvious separation of concepts with good use of >>> [xxx] markers. >>> >>> I'm used to getting a lot of mail list traffic into my inbox, >>> and yet I'm starting to treat the list as a lot of white-noise. >>> >>> Any need for improvements, or am I just being a wimp? >>> >>> Hen >>> >>> >> >