Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73870 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2003 01:29:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73855 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2003 01:29:48 -0000 Received: from whirlwind.netspace.net.au (HELO mail.netspace.net.au) (203.10.110.76) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2003 01:29:48 -0000 Received: from binky (CPE-203-45-10-6.vic.bigpond.net.au [203.45.10.6]) by mail.netspace.net.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 570E6D37D8 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 11:31:22 +1000 (EST) Reply-To: From: "Tim Anderson" To: Subject: RE: [jms][patch] Integrating OpenJMS Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 11:31:15 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <20030815143047.18717.h010.c000.wm@mail.worden.org.criticalpath.net> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Go for it. Note that OpenJMS is still on version 1.0.2 of the JMS spec. I hadn't planned to upgrade to 1.1 until the OpenJMS 0.8 release, but I guess I can bring that forward. -Tim > -----Original Message----- > From: brent@worden.org [mailto:brent@worden.org] > Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2003 7:31 AM > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [jms][patch] Integrating OpenJMS > > > If no one has started and no one objects, I was planning to begin > integrating OpenJMS into Geronimo. > > My plan of attack was going to include: > > 1) Adding the JMS specification source files to specs/j2ee. This is > done as I've completed adding the ASF license to the JMS 1.1 source > files and included an archive of the modified files. > > 2) Creating a generic JMS provider SPI and adding it to the core > module. The interface would include the MBeans to manage the JMS > components, the means to bind administered objects to the naming > context, provided the JMS stats as per JSR77, etc. > > 3) Creating a OpenJMS implementation for the JMS SPI. > > If anyone has any thoughts, concerns, or guidance, feel free to share. > > Brent Worden > http://www.brent.worden.org/ >