Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <3F33BFDF.7010608@daniel.stefan.haischt.name>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:21:03 +0200
From: "Daniel S. Haischt" <me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: "Virtual Hosting"
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308081203570.5667-100000@www.princetongames.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308081203570.5667-100000@www.princetongames.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

btw - who is erin mulder?

obviously i am just asking this question because
your mail addresses do have the same domain and
because your surenames are the same.

i beg u pardon if i am too curious.

regards

daniel s. haischt
--

Aaron Mulder wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Justin Ju wrote:
> 
>>just like server cluster, but some environment context may be shared among
>>all these applications?
> 
> 
> 	Ideally, it would appear to each application that it was the only 
> application running in the server, despite the fact that there may 
> actually be 3 or 4 or a dozen apps running in the server.  So if an 
> application crawls JNDI, it will see nothing but its own stuff.  If three 
> applications each declare a DB pool called "Database", the bindings won't 
> fail or replace other bindings, but instead each app will see only its own 
> DB pool.  If a user can log in to application A (and it's JNDI space), 
> that does not mean the user can log in to application B (or its JNDI 
> space).  Like virtual hosting, in the sense that as far as each app is 
> concerned it's the only app, whereas under the covers there may be loads 
> of them.
> 
> Aaron
>