Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19670 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2003 21:51:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19606 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2003 21:51:32 -0000 Received: from web11203.mail.yahoo.com (216.136.131.185) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2003 21:51:32 -0000 Message-ID: <20030813215138.83261.qmail@web11203.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.238.64.1] by web11203.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:51:38 PDT Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:51:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Urberg Reply-To: tim_urberg@yahoo.com Subject: RE: WebServices & UI team To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <149246706FF1AF4996A41898AB45325310F5@customer.panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Why do we need both a web interface and a webservice interface? Tim OpenEJB Developer --- Alan Cabrera wrote: > A webservice interface is an XML API interface. It can be implemented by > either JSPs or servlets but, it's usually implemented by the latter. > > > Regards, > > Alan > OpenEJB Developer > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Urberg [mailto:tim_urberg@yahoo.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:38 PM > > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: WebServices & UI team > > > > > > What's the difference between the web interface and the > > webservice interface? > > What kind of web server do we use? Tomcat or home made? Do > > we use JSP's, Servlets or both? Should we use Struts (or is > > that too much)? > > > > --- Gary Yang wrote: > > > I have a rough idea: > > > > > > > > > Web Interface WebService Interface > > > | | > > > | | > > > |______________________| > > > | > > > | > > > JSP/Servlet Wrapper > > Standalone > > > UI > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > |_____________________________| > > > | > > > | > > > EJB 2.0 Interface > > > | > > > | > > > Management Module > > > | > > > | > > > JMX > > > > > > > > > Since the management module has an EJB 2.0 interface, it can have a > > > lightweigh connection with servlets or Standalone UI if > > they are in a > > > same JVM. > > > > > > Gary > >