Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44420 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2003 21:11:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44382 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2003 21:11:44 -0000 Received: from eng.werken.com (HELO hogshead.codehaus.org) (66.216.68.111) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2003 21:11:44 -0000 Received: from hogshead.codehaus.org (hogshead.codehaus.org [66.216.68.111]) by hogshead.codehaus.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h7MLLF115728 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:21:20 -0500 Message-ID: <17863876.1061587275286.JavaMail.orion@hogshead.codehaus.org> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:21:15 -0500 (CDT) From: jira@codehaus.org To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-9) assert keyword/identifier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. --------------------------------------------------------------------- View the issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=GERONIMO-9 Here is an overview of the issue: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: GERONIMO-9 Summary: assert keyword/identifier Type: Bug Status: Unassigned Priority: Minor Time Spent: Unknown Remaining: Unknown Project: Apache Geronimo Assignee: Reporter: Ralph Apel Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 4:20 PM Updated: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 4:20 PM Environment: running javadoc with a non-standard doclet Description: There are some source files using assert() (from an older junit?), while others use the assert keyword. This doesn't seem a problem for building nor generating standard javadocs. Nevertheless it is an inconsistency. Running javadoc with a non-standard doclet, it seems to result in a mixing of identifier + keyword, causing the later to fail. More exactly: with only the identifier, there are only warnings, but as soon as there is a keyword additionally, the process fails. The files are: ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/ejb/context/StatelessBMTInterceptor.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/ejb/context/StatefulBMTInterceptor.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/ejb/context/TxExecutionContext.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/ejb/context/CMTInterceptor.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/ejb/context/ExecutionContext.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/ejb/cache/StatefulInstanceInterceptor.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/jmx/MBeanProxyFactory.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/jmx/RelationshipMBeanProxyFactory.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/core/log/NamedNDCConverter.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/lock/WriterPreferredInstanceLock.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/lock/LockDomain.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/lock/WriterPreferredInstanceLock2.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/lock/LockInterceptor.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/lock/WriterPreferredInstanceLock3.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/cache/SimpleInstanceCache.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/scanner/URLInfo.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/scanner/WebDAVScanner.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/ejb/container/EJBContainerUtil.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/ejb/EJBInvocationUtil.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/remoting/InvocationSupport.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/remoting/InvocationType.java ./modules/core/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/common/InvocationType.java --------------------------------------------------------------------- JIRA INFORMATION: This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira