Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63228 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2003 12:25:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63153 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 12:25:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO george.toolazydogs.com) (166.84.147.110) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2003 12:25:44 -0000 Received: by customer.panix.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:36:37 -0400 Message-ID: <149246706FF1AF4996A41898AB4532531101@customer.panix.com> From: Alan Cabrera To: "'geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org'" Subject: API Source code for JSR specs Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:36:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C36260.B2F79BA0" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C36260.B2F79BA0 Content-Type: text/plain I noticed that the API source code for JSR88 is in \modules\spec\specs. Do we need to include API source code for all JSRs in there? If so, what's the reason for this? Also, should we have signature checking unit tests like mx4j has? Regards, Alan ------_=_NextPart_001_01C36260.B2F79BA0 Content-Type: text/html Message
I noticed that the API source code for JSR88 is in \modules\spec\specs.  Do we need to include API source code for all JSRs in there?  If so, what's the reason for this?  Also, should we have signature checking unit tests like mx4j has?
 
 
Regards,
Alan
 
------_=_NextPart_001_01C36260.B2F79BA0--