Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45706 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2003 11:30:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45684 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 11:30:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO george.toolazydogs.com) (166.84.147.110) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2003 11:30:41 -0000 Received: by customer.panix.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 07:41:33 -0400 Message-ID: <149246706FF1AF4996A41898AB4532531100@customer.panix.com> From: Alan Cabrera To: "'geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Standard @version tags Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 07:41:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 @version $Revision$ $Date$ > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Dillon [mailto:jason@coredevelopers.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:38 AM > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Standard @version tags > > > Can we make a decision on this? > > Either: > > @version $Revision$ $Date$ > > or: > > @version $Revision$ > > Personally I like to see how old the file is from the JavaDocs, but > really I care more about what the final decision is, I will go either > way. > > --jason > > PS. Once we decide I will clean up my sources ;-) > > > On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 01:59 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > > This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Boynes said: > > > > JB>> I actually prefer the following because it cantains all I need: > > JB>> > > JB>> @version $Id$ > > JB> > > JB>We opted against $Id$ during the import to avoid having the > > username in > > JB>there (the @author thing). > > > > I should have made a note about that because as I sent the > message I > > realized that for that reason alone I can understand why we > didn't use > > $Id$. > > > > +1 for @version $Revision$ $Date$ > > > > Bruce > > -- > > perl -e 'print > > unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F9E > > > The Castor Project > > http://www.castor.org/ > > > > Apache Geronimo http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html > > >