Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75845 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2003 21:45:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75828 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2003 21:45:04 -0000 Received: from amsfep11-int.chello.nl (213.46.243.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2003 21:45:04 -0000 Received: from hydra ([212.187.21.99]) by amsfep11-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with ESMTP id <20030815214509.EQCF11121.amsfep11-int.chello.nl@hydra> for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:45:09 +0200 Subject: Re: JDBC From: Maas van den Berg To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1060984214.1275.34.camel@hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:50:14 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 23:30, Bruce Snyder wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Maas van den Berg said: > > MvdB>Just wanted to let you know that I've continued my braindead activities > MvdB>and just finished typing in the JCA apis. Don't know if we need them but > MvdB>they are here. I'll write some unittests and post the > MvdB>stuff in a bit. > MvdB> > MvdB>Maas > MvdB> > MvdB>On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 23:34, Aaron Mulder wrote: > MvdB>> What's the advantage to supporting JDBC through JCA? Is it that > MvdB>> JCA requires logic to deal with associating with transactions and > MvdB>> security, and if JDBC works through that we don't have to implement the > MvdB>> same features twice? Or are there other considerations? > MvdB>> > MvdB>> Aaron > MvdB>> > MvdB>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, David Jencks wrote: > MvdB>> > IMNSHO jdbc support should be through the JCA (connector) support and > MvdB>> > jca-jdbc wrappers. > MvdB>> > > MvdB>> > I think jca should be a separate module ("connector") > MvdB>> > > MvdB>> > AFAIK the only specific communication with the ejb subsystem needed can > MvdB>> > be provided by an interceptor that makes sure connection handles get > MvdB>> > re-associated under the correct security context. > > Great, when you're finished, please send them to me and I'll get them > checked in. Also, please make sure that you use the following version > taglet in the class level Javadoc for all classes: > > @version $Revision$ $Date$ > > Bruce I'll will. I should use the LICENSE with the tailing line comments stating 'hands off etc...', instead of the version where these remarks are included within ASF license block comment, right ? Maas