Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-geronimo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73076 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2003 11:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact geronimo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73060 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2003 11:34:08 -0000 Received: from smtp102.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (216.136.174.140) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2003 11:34:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yahoo.co.uk) (james?strachan@217.204.102.101 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2003 11:34:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:34:04 +0100 Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE deployment verifier) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: James Strachan To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <3F397B15.3060703@jonandkerry.com> Message-Id: <0B25CB6E-CD82-11D7-A504-000A959D0312@yahoo.co.uk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 12:41 am, Jonathan Duty wrote: > I'm creating a maven module to add to the cvs project. > Do we want to plan on the DeploymentManager, VerificationEngine, and > DeploymentEngine being in one module? I'd maybe keep deployment separate from verification. Though if in doubt, I'd say reuse the same module - we can always refactor later. I'd rather we start with too few modules initially than too many. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/