geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Hamblett" <shambl...@charter.net>
Subject Re: [JNDI] "Virtual Hosting"
Date Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:04:07 GMT
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:23:15 -0400 (EDT)
  Aaron Mulder <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Kington, Max wrote:
>> This could be a function of the security provilages, in 
>>terms of visibility.
>> E.g. with a particular group of user logins to the 
>>directory, they are
>> associated
>> with a different underlying directory stores.
>
>	True, but it also impinges on configuration and 
>deployment.  
>Several servers assume that resources such as 
>JDBC/JMS/JavaMail are
>"server" resources not "application" resources.  In other 
>words, if 5 apps
>need 8 DB pools, then all 8 pools are visible to all 5 
>apps.  We would
>need to agree in principle to at least allow, if not 
>require, resources to
>be associated with specific applications.
>
>Aaron
>

Would a server configuration similar to Tomcats common, 
shared, and apps be benificial to allow for maximum 
flexablity for configuring Geronimo, and the apps deployed 
to it?

Sean

<TEXTAREA NAME="Signature" ROWS="4" COLS="60">

Mime
View raw message