geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "gianny DAMOUR" <gianny_dam...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [PATCH] JSR77 - 4 managed objects
Date Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:06:14 GMT
Hello,


>These should be interface definitions rather than concrete classes - there
>could be a variety of classes implementing them.

I diagree with this one. It is nice to provide an interface but not 
required. However, I have refactored the proposed patch.

>Secondly, there should not need to be any references to javax.management in
>them - the intention is that this model can be used by non-Java clients and
>so all the attributes should be simple types; for example, the spec defines
>the OBJECT_NAME type to be a string.

I agree with you. My initial intent was to have an implementation which was 
returning ObjectName. The management application mediator, e.g. MEJB, wich 
seats between the client and the model, was in charge of extracting from the 
ObjectName the OBJECT_NAME as a String.

However, I have refactored the proposed patch.

Cheers,
Gianny

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail : un compte GRATUIT qui vous suit partout et tout le temps ! 
http://g.msn.fr/FR1000/9493

Mime
View raw message