geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Snyder <>
Subject Re: JDBC
Date Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:30:52 GMT
This one time, at band camp, Maas van den Berg said:

MvdB>Just wanted to let you know that I've continued my braindead activities
MvdB>and just finished typing in the JCA apis. Don't know if we need them but
MvdB>they are here. I'll write some unittests and post the
MvdB>stuff in a bit.
MvdB>On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 23:34, Aaron Mulder wrote:
MvdB>> 	What's the advantage to supporting JDBC through JCA?  Is it that 
MvdB>> JCA requires logic to deal with associating with transactions and 
MvdB>> security, and if JDBC works through that we don't have to implement the 
MvdB>> same features twice?  Or are there other considerations?
MvdB>> Aaron
MvdB>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, David Jencks wrote:
MvdB>> > IMNSHO jdbc support should be through the JCA (connector) support and 
MvdB>> > jca-jdbc wrappers.
MvdB>> > 
MvdB>> > I think jca should be a separate module ("connector")
MvdB>> > 
MvdB>> > AFAIK the only specific communication with the ejb subsystem needed can

MvdB>> > be provided by an interceptor that makes sure connection handles get 
MvdB>> > re-associated under the correct security context.

Great, when you're finished, please send them to me and I'll get them
checked in. Also, please make sure that you use the following version
taglet in the class level Javadoc for all classes:

    @version $Revision$ $Date$

perl -e 'print unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'

The Castor Project

Apache Geronimo

View raw message