geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Justin Ju" <>
Subject Re: geronimo and avalon?
Date Fri, 08 Aug 2003 07:54:41 GMT
I think you are right.
Either JMX or Avalon, it is born after a successful project, the fomer one is born after JBoss.
If this project comply with JMX, it may looks like JBoss.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <>
To: "Jason Dillon" <>; "Leo Simons" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:58 AM
Subject: RE: geronimo and avalon?

> Jason,
> > I have had a look at Avalon several times in the past and very recently
> > looked over some of the web pages...
> FYI, the Avalon Frameworks have been stable, but Avalon container
> development has gone through a period of change.  As of very recently, there
> appears to be a hard won consensus on a single extensible codebase.  At its
> core, that codebase focuses on how to build containers (sort of a Service
> Provider interface for containers).  Actual containers are built on that
> model, exposing the behaviors and interfaces necessary for components.
> > I [hope] implement [an] enhanced loading, component model and
> > deployment system.  It does not appear that any one system has
> > all of the bases covered, which would mean that we would have
> > a lot of hacking work to get something integrated and functional.
> > perhaps we should start out with and outline of the core system
> > services for Geronimo and the requirements for each, and then we
> > can see which systems may be suitable for integration.
> Sounds reasonable.  What do you feel Geronimo will need?
> --- Noel
View raw message