geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Strachan <>
Subject Re: [JSR-88] Which Java Package?
Date Thu, 14 Aug 2003 06:45:33 GMT

On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 04:55  am, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> 	I'm fine with .server and .tool, but I don't think .common is
> necessarily right for the other stuff.  I guess by "the other stuff", 
> I'm
> thinking of any kind of "back end logic" responsible for doing stuff on
> the server side, that won't be exposed to the client.
> 	Just saying that though makes me think that perhaps ".server"
> doesn't mean what we want it to mean.  Perhaps they should be
> .enterprise.deploy.provider  // the JSR-88 provider code
> .enterprise.deploy.tool      // the JSR-88 tool code
> .enterprise.deploy.server    // the back-end Geronimo logic that
>                              // is not specific to JSR-88
> 	My only concern is that if we have any subpackages, a 7-part
> package name is kind of gross.

How about the above but without the .enterprise? Geronimo is an 
enterprise server so I guess thats not required.


View raw message