On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 04:55 am, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> I'm fine with .server and .tool, but I don't think .common is
> necessarily right for the other stuff. I guess by "the other stuff",
> I'm
> thinking of any kind of "back end logic" responsible for doing stuff on
> the server side, that won't be exposed to the client.
>
> Just saying that though makes me think that perhaps ".server"
> doesn't mean what we want it to mean. Perhaps they should be
>
> .enterprise.deploy.provider // the JSR-88 provider code
> .enterprise.deploy.tool // the JSR-88 tool code
> .enterprise.deploy.server // the back-end Geronimo logic that
> // is not specific to JSR-88
>
> My only concern is that if we have any subpackages, a 7-part
> package name is kind of gross.
How about the above but without the .enterprise? Geronimo is an
enterprise server so I guess thats not required.
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
|