geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject Re: [JSR77] Workplan proposal
Date Fri, 15 Aug 2003 16:08:43 GMT
I'm going to try to create a implementation that respects 77 with a 
ModelMBean today.  If this does work we will be able to make any pojo 
respect 77.

-dain

On Friday, August 15, 2003, at 03:06 AM, Alex Blewitt wrote:

>
> On Friday, Aug 15, 2003, at 01:50 Europe/London, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
>> JSR77 is a bit strange.
>>
>> It specifies object models, but without saying that they are actual
>> classes and definitely not saying what package they are in.
>
> I think it just defines object models, doesn't it?
>
>> Thus I think we should put the classes that implement the JSR77 object
>> models into the spec module.  But pick our own suitable package
>> name for them.  I think org.apache.management.j2ee is what we
>> should use.
>
> Is JSR77 actually only J2EE? I thought it could be used outside of 
> J2EE (say, for example, in avalon or other type frameworks).
>
> Might be better to remove the 'j2ee' -- why not use 'jsr77' since 
> that's what it's known as on this list, and possibly others as well?
>
> Alex.
>
>

/*************************
  * Dain Sundstrom
  * Partner
  * Core Developers Network
  *************************/


Mime
View raw message