geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Monson-Haefel <Rich...@Monson-Haefel.com>
Subject Re: Standard @version tags
Date Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:39:57 GMT
+1 on including the $Date$

On 8/13/03 11:38 PM, "Jason Dillon" <jason@coredevelopers.net> wrote:

> Can we make a decision on this?
> 
> Either:
> 
> @version $Revision$ $Date$
> 
> or:
> 
> @version $Revision$
> 
> Personally I like to see how old the file is from the JavaDocs, but
> really I care more about what the final decision is, I will go either
> way.
> 
> --jason
> 
> PS.  Once we decide I will clean up my sources ;-)
> 
> 
> On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 01:59  AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> 
>> This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Boynes said:
>> 
>> JB>> I actually prefer the following because it cantains all I need:
>> JB>>
>> JB>> @version $Id$
>> JB>
>> JB>We opted against $Id$ during the import to avoid having the
>> username in
>> JB>there (the @author thing).
>> 
>> I should have made a note about that because as I sent the message
>> I realized that for that reason alone I can understand why we didn't
>> use $Id$.
>> 
>> +1 for @version $Revision$ $Date$
>> 
>> Bruce
>> -- 
>> perl -e 'print 
>> unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'
>> 
>> The Castor Project
>> http://www.castor.org/
>> 
>> Apache Geronimo
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html
>> 
> 

-- 
Richard Monson-Haefel
Co-Founder\Developer, Apache Geronimo
Author of:
  J2EE Web Services (AW 2003)
  Enterprise JavaBeans, 4ed (O'Reilly 2004)
  Java Message Service (O'Reilly 2000)
http://www.Monson-Haefel.com


Mime
View raw message