geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject Re: API Source code for JSR specs
Date Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:17:22 GMT
Can we borrow it for our use?

--jason


On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 09:12  PM, Cabrera, Alan wrote:

> Mx4j has unit tests that kick in if the jars from Sun are in the lib 
> directory.  They check all the interfaces/classes to make sure that 
> they match.  It's quite handy.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Dillon [mailto:jason@coredevelopers.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:37 AM
> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: API Source code for JSR specs
>
> Refresh my memory please... I do not know what you mean, nor do I know 
> what mx4j is doing... but if I had to guess I would say yes ;-)
>
>
> --jason
>
>
>
> On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 08:25 PM, Cabrera, Alan wrote:
>
>
> Ok.   If there are no objections, I will start on JSR115.  Have you 
> given any consideration to my question about us having signature 
> checking unit tests like mx4j has?
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Jason Dillon [mailto:jason@coredevelopers.net]
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 8:35 AM
>
> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> Subject: Re: API Source code for JSR specs
>
>
> I am working on finalizing where spec stuff will go. I made an 
> assumption about how maven works which turns out to be in correct.
>
>
>
> The purpose of these sources is to allow geronimo to build with out 
> having to have users go to sun and download there specs... there is 
> some license fluff with putting the sun impls into the default 
> repository.
>
>
>
> --jason
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 07:36 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
>
>
> I noticed that the API source code for JSR88 is in 
> \modules\spec\specs.  Do we need to include API source code for all 
> JSRs in there?  If so, what's the reason for this?  Also, should we 
> have signature checking unit tests like mx4j has?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message