geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Strachan <james_strac...@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: OpenJMS and EJB MDBs
Date Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:40:55 GMT
AFAIK OpenJms is the most suitable JMS implementation today which has a 
suitable licence for Geronimo. If another JMS implementation were to 
come along, or folks fancied hacking another one together cool - but 
until then I don't see another option for the foreseeable future.



On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 03:42  pm, N. Alex Rupp wrote:

> I believe David Jencks and Hiram Chirino would have more to say about 
> this.
> Hiram's a bit preoccupied this week (moving).
>
> James, what do you know about the JMS plans?
>
> : )
> --
> N. Alex Rupp (norm@coredevelopers.net)
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <edcurry@eircom.net>
> To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 8:27 AM
> Subject: Re: OpenJMS and EJB MDBs
>
>
>>> Is OpenJMS primary JMS implementation for Geronimo?
>>
>> Presuming this decision has not already been made, what are the 
>> options
> for JMS in Geronimo ?
>>
>>   A)  Use/Fork OpenJMS ?
>>
>>   B)  Implement a new stand-alone JMS provider ?
>>
>>   C)  Implement a new JMS provider using services from Geronimo
> (persistence, trans, etc) ?
>>
>> IMHO Options A and C seems like the best ones!
>>
>>
>
>

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/


Mime
View raw message