geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Updated JavaMail and Activation project files
Date Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:17:37 GMT
I am not in favor of creating artifact groups for each module or spec, 
but only for high-level organization.  Specs go into the geronimo-spec 
group and everything else goes into the geronimo group.


On Saturday, August 16, 2003, at 06:59  PM, Alex Blewitt wrote:

> On Saturday, Aug 16, 2003, at 12:52 Europe/London, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Please, lets not worry about moving things out of geronimo at this 
>> time.
> I wasn't worrying about moving them out now, but I don't think it's 
> sensible for geronimo-javamail to be built as a separate unit that 
> then depends on geronimo-spec. I think it's sensible to move it out to 
> a separate build in any case, or failing that fold the 
> geronimo-javamail back into the geronimo-spec module (which I would 
> not prefer).
> Alex.
>>> Modified activation to be in separate geronimo-activation package 
>>> instead of geronimo-spec (to support easier refactoring into 
>>> commons-activation at a future stage).
>>> Modified javamail to maintain relationship.

View raw message