geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guenther, Kurt - NASHCCON" <>
Subject RE: Central piece: to JMX or not to JMX - Avalon
Date Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:02:40 GMT

Got me there.  Yes, CMP is usually easier with generated code.  I suppose
some abstract engine could be devised, but I wouldn't go so far as to
recommend it.

Need some code to play with....   Any ETA on CVS?


-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Mulder []
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:25 PM
Subject: RE: Central piece: to JMX or not to JMX - Avalon

On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Guenther, Kurt - NASHCCON wrote:
> I've seen the reflection approach work out very well to the point where
> generated code was no longer necessary to support EJB's.  When you see
> CTS, you'll see where this would be valuable and it also lends itself to a
> fluid development environment. 

	Some level of generated code (or generated bytecode) is always 
going to be necessary for CMP, though, since CMP EJB classes are abstract.  


> I'm somewhat inclined to think reflection as a modus operandi for
> backplane would be a good thing.

View raw message