geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject Re: Suggested coding convention: sort methods
Date Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:39:04 GMT
Kay, just checking ;-)

--jason


On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 08:34  PM, <Dirk.Weibel@ferguson.com> 
wrote:

> No, not a single IDE.  That's like ordering a single size of boots for 
> an army.  I was thinking along the lines of a Pretty Printer.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Dillon [mailto:jason@coredevelopers.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:33 AM
>> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Suggested coding convention: sort methods
>>
>>
>> Single tool?  Like a single IDE?  Not gonna happen IMO.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 08:28  PM,
>> <Dirk.Weibel@ferguson.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm also 1+ on consistant coding standards/conventions, regardless
>>> what form they take.  Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the
>>> difference between automatically enforcing style and manually
>>> refactoring a class to be in conformance with the standard?  Would
>>> standardizing on a single tool resolve the sync problem?
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Mark Mahieu [mailto:mark@twistedbanana.demon.co.uk]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:13 AM
>>>> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Suggested coding convention: sort methods
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The real can of worms is opened when developers start
>>>> reformatting code
>>>> with Pretty Printers or IDEs and then try to get their
>>>> patches applied;
>>>> everything is suddenly out of sync with what's in CVS.  Even
>>>> automatically enforcing the style as it gets checked in
>>>> doesn't really
>>>> avoid that one.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure I could find some earlier, er, 'discussions' about
>>>> this in the
>>>> archives of other mailing lists for everyone's amusement ;-)
>>>>
>>>> For what it's worth, I'm +1 on the general idea though.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message