geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adrian Jackson" <>
Subject RE: uml (was: documentation)
Date Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:18:49 GMT
Fine for viewing, but if there are any (larger) diagrams that might need
editing - particularly by others - in the future, JPG isn't exactly the
happiest of formats to have them available in.


-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [] 
Sent: 13 August 2003 17:08
Subject: Re: uml (was: documentation)

On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 04:38  pm, Daniel Hofstetter wrote:

>>          Also if any person is interested in knowing the internals,
>> they
>> should have the necessary documentation with UML diagrams in place
>> how everything fits together. I suggest that every group specified in
>> this link
>> _Topi
>> cs take care of the necessary design documentation (of the source
>> along with UML diagrams) on the stuff they are working on. This will

>> let
>> any new person joining the group (to contribute) get a head start on

>> the
>> design and implementation. This way they will be more productive and
>> also be encouraged, by having fewer hurdles to cross...
> Is there a convention by the ASF using a certain file format for uml 
> diagrams? I think it's not useful if one uses the format of Rational 
> Rose and an
> other
> uses an
> incompatible format...

Anything viewable on the web is good. Say PNG, GIF, JPG etc. :)


View raw message