geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Strachan <>
Subject Re: how about maven?
Date Thu, 07 Aug 2003 21:59:06 GMT

On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 10:51  pm, Danny Angus wrote:

>> At the risk of giving poor Sam apoplexy, I think that of all projects,
>> Geronimo should use GUMP as well (not instead of!).
> +1
> I had the same thought as soon as I saw the announcement, not only 
> would
> this test geronimo against its dependancies it would also enable 
> geronimo
> development to be broken down into the asynchronous development of a 
> number
> of discrete sub-projects dealing with different areas.
> I'm assuming that it is going to be impractical to have a huge number 
> of
> people (judging by the offers of support) working simultaneously on a 
> single
> big codebase..

As soon as this is checked in you'll see we've a modular hierarchical 
build system of sub-modules - each with their own dependencies that can 
be built independently - using Maven (or Ant) for 1 module or Maven (& 
Reactor) for the whole tree.


View raw message