geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Hamblett <shambl...@charter.net>
Subject Re: [JSR77] Workplan proposal
Date Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:18:10 GMT

Whoops, it looks like I put words into Alex's mouth, I, Sean, sent the 
previous message.  Sorry for the confusion.

Sean

On Friday 15 August 2003 11:15 am, Sean Hamblett wrote:
> On Friday 15 August 2003 04:06 am, Alex Blewitt wrote:
>
> To help organize the communication I have created the following topic,
> JSR-77 Implementation here
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ApacheJ2EE/Volunteers-_Topics
>
> I hope this helps identify everyone involved in bringing this together.  I
> don't know if we want to add a page under the Architecture page, and
> centralize our communication efforts (design docs, etc.).
>
> Sean
>
> > On Friday, Aug 15, 2003, at 01:50 Europe/London, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> > > JSR77 is a bit strange.
> > >
> > > It specifies object models, but without saying that they are actual
> > > classes and definitely not saying what package they are in.
> >
> > I think it just defines object models, doesn't it?
> >
> > > Thus I think we should put the classes that implement the JSR77 object
> > > models into the spec module.  But pick our own suitable package
> > > name for them.  I think org.apache.management.j2ee is what we
> > > should use.
> >
> > Is JSR77 actually only J2EE? I thought it could be used outside of J2EE
> > (say, for example, in avalon or other type frameworks).
> >
> > Might be better to remove the 'j2ee' -- why not use 'jsr77' since
> > that's what it's known as on this list, and possibly others as well?
> >
> > Alex.


Mime
View raw message