geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Weston M. Price" <westo...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: JMX as a kernel (was: Re: geronimo and avalon?)
Date Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:38:23 GMT
And one time...at band camp.....


Does anyone want me to go on?

Weston
On Monday 11 August 2003 04:40 pm, Alex Blewitt wrote:
> On Monday, Aug 11, 2003, at 17:17 Europe/London, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Alex Blewitt said:
>
> Band camp? I've never been to band camp.
>
> :-)
> :
> > AB>Lastly, if the focus is on 'The kernel is JMX' then that may
> > AB>unnecessarily affect design decisions: 'Hey, lets use MBeans
> > defined in
> > AB>XML on a single flat file'. We could follow JBoss' example and do
> > this;
> > AB>or we could be more innovative, using a configuration registry
> > backed
> > AB>with JNDI/LDAP, whilst still providing a Management interface over
> > JMX.
> >
> > I was actually thinking about another discussion discussing the storage
> > of configuration metadata in some type of respository. The first thing
> > that comes to my mind is a solution accessible via JNDI and backed by
> > anything that is JNDI accessible. LDAP would be my first choice as
> > well,
> > but because not every environment can deal with LDAP, the JNDI
> > interface
> > allows anything to be implemented. This need could certainly be met by
> > the
> > LDAPd project which is currently trying to become an Incubator project.
>
> Yeah, I'd agree that JNDI makes the most sense as a registry front end,
> and that an LDAP implementation would be the best service for that. And
> I'd definitely vote for an LDAP storage engine inside Geronimo.
>
> See also
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ConfigurationAsRegistry
> for more comments about this list; feel free to add comments in there
> to the LDAP/LDAPd project as appropriate.
>
> Alex.

Mime
View raw message