geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <>
Subject Re: [JSR77] Workplan proposal
Date Sun, 17 Aug 2003 23:54:17 GMT
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 06:37 PM, gianny DAMOUR wrote:

>> I have seen some patches that implement some of the top
>> level objects, but I haven't seen them under the specs.  Is anyone 
>> else
>> working on this, if not I would like to.
> I checked the repository yesterday, and at this time, the top level 
> classes are not committed. It has been decided to define these classes 
> in the package
>> Is anyone else working on this, if not I would like to.
> I am also "working" on JSR77. My current goal is to propose a strategy 
> to plug the model without significant impacts on the kernel (I have 
> defined some instrumentation interfaces, what I called "glue" in 
> previous mails, to be used by the kernel to provide the information 
> required by the model). I should be able to release this proposal 
> tonight. I was unable to submit it yesterday because 
> AbstractStateManageable "extends" NotificationBroadcasterSupport. 
> Weird...Perhaps that it should only use under the cover a 
> NotificationBroadcasterSupport. To be discussed.

I did that.  I am using the 77 live cycle to drive deployment, which is 
basically done.  I am working out the last bugs and will post a quick 
how-to sometime tomorrow (hopefully).  The 77 life cycle is fully 
implemented and supported.  I also, added dependencies and relationship 
support, but I'll post a description of those tomorrow.


  * Dain Sundstrom
  * Partner
  * Core Developers Network

View raw message