geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Cabrera <...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject RE: WebServices & UI team
Date Wed, 13 Aug 2003 22:41:52 GMT
Wait, maybe I'm missing something.  Do you mean that these web services
would not be used to control the servers and are, instead, application web
services?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Cabrera [mailto:adc@toolazydogs.com] 
> 
> Why a webservice interface when JSR160 handles it?  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rahul [mailto:rahul.thakur@excibir.co.nz]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 6:26 PM
> > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: WebServices & UI team
> > 
> > 
> > IMO web services would be managed by admin console too.
> > :)
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alan Cabrera" <adc@toolazydogs.com>
> > To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:24 AM
> > Subject: RE: WebServices & UI team
> > 
> > 
> > > Yes, that's a reason to use JMX.  Why a webservice interface?
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rahul [mailto:rahul.thakur@excibir.co.nz]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 6:13 PM
> > > > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: WebServices & UI team
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > we would need a web interface for administration 
> purposes, for a 
> > > > user who can manage the J2EE container
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Alan Cabrera" <adc@toolazydogs.com>
> > > > To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:04 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: WebServices & UI team
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Not sure.  Would have thought that JSR160 would have taken
> > > > care of it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Alan
> > > > > OpenEJB Developer
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Tim Urberg [mailto:tim_urberg@yahoo.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:52 PM
> > > > > > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: RE: WebServices & UI team
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why do we need both a web interface and a webservice
> > interface?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tim
> > > > > > OpenEJB Developer
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Alan Cabrera <adc@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > A webservice interface is an XML API interface.  It can
be
> > > > > > implemented
> > > > > > > by either JSPs or servlets but, it's usually 
> implemented by
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > latter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Alan
> > > > > > > OpenEJB Developer
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Tim Urberg [mailto:tim_urberg@yahoo.com]
> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:38 PM
> > > > > > > > To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: WebServices & UI team
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What's the difference between the web interface and
the 
> > > > > > > > webservice interface? What kind of web server do we
> > > > use?  Tomcat
> > > > > > > > or home made?  Do we use JSP's, Servlets or both?
> > > > Should we use
> > > > > > > > Struts (or is that too much)?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- Gary Yang <ygary2@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I have a rough idea:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Web Interface                  WebService Interface
> > > > > > > > >      |                                      
     |
> > > > > > > > >      |                                      
     |
> > > > > > > > >      |______________________|
> > > > > > > > >                           |
> > > > > > > > >                           |
> > > > > > > > >              JSP/Servlet Wrapper
> > > > > > > >      Standalone
> > > > > > > > > UI
> > > > > > > > >                           |
> > > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > >                           |
> > > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > >                           
> > |_____________________________|
> > > > > > > > >                                             
   
> >          |
> > > > > > > > >                                             
   
> >          |
> > > > > > > > >                                             
 
>   EJB 2.0
> > > > > > Interface
> > > > > > > > >                                             
   
> >          |
> > > > > > > > >                                             
   
> >          |
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > Management Module
> > > > > > > > >                                             
   
> >          |
> > > > > > > > >                                             
   
> >          |
> > > > > > > > >                                             
   
> >       JMX
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since the management module has an EJB 2.0 interface,
> > > > > > it can have
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > lightweigh connection with servlets or 
> Standalone UI if
> > > > > > > > they are in a
> > > > > > > > > same JVM.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Gary
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 

Mime
View raw message