geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Cabrera <...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject RE: OpenEJB
Date Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:18:28 GMT
Aaron,

I just caught this message.  Your characterization that OpenEJB does not
have a security service is not entirely correct.  As you know from our
discussions about implementing JSR88 last month, I've been working on this
security service.

Alan
OpenEJB Developer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu] 
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:38 PM
> To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OpenEJB
> 
> 
> 	You missed the fact that OpenEJB doesn't qualify as a 
> "working"  
> container...  And I say that as a contributor, not to be 
> mean.  It's generally aimed at 1.1 and there are some major 
> features currently missing (like security).  This is not to 
> say the energy couldn't be put there instead of elsewhere to 
> turn out the EJB container for Geronimo, but personally I'm 
> waiting to see what the imported code looks like before I 
> start arguing one way or another.  Ideally, we'd end up with 
> the best of both worlds (or next best, two worlds that are 
> drop-in replacements).  I 
> don't want to see anyone's energy squashed.
> 
> Aaron
> 
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Michael Turilin wrote:
> > Why OpenEJB container doesn't used as EJB Container in Geronimo 
> > project?
> > 
> > As I understand Richard Monson-Haefel now is in the team
> > and maybe he could donate existing and WORKING container
> > for further development and Geronimo won't need Elba and 
> JBoss to make 
> > it's upcoming components useful...
> > 
> > Or I miss something?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Michael Turilin
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message