geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Test Account" <cmiller...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: Reflection Bad, OO and direct Method invocation Good...
Date Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:21:17 GMT
Greg,

    Absolutely, that was the gist of what I was trying to say, albeit,
somewhat poorly.  You want the fast dynamic development deployment
capabilities while banging out endless refactorings.  But when it comes time
to deploy in a scalable environment you may need to eek every last drop of
performance, so may need the compiled skeletons.  It would be great to have
both.  The problem would be in guaranteeing consistency between the two
paths.  I wouldn't want to get differing behavior when running in
development from when running in production.

Enjoy,

Craig

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Wilkins" <gregw@mortbay.com>
To: <geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: Reflection Bad, OO and direct Method invocation Good...


>
> I don't know if this falls into the "too much choice is a bad thing"
> arena, but would it not be good if we could have both a dynamic jboss
> inspired EJB container and a compiled EJB container (perhaps from
> or inspired by the JOnAS folks??).
>
> -- 
> Greg Wilkins<gregw@mortbay.com>             Phone/fax: +44 7092063462
> Mort Bay Consulting Australia and UK.          http://www.mortbay.com
>


Mime
View raw message