geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James deGraft-Johnson" <jdegr...@digaman.com>
Subject RE: What is the official name...
Date Fri, 15 Aug 2003 04:28:50 GMT
I was under the impression that it had already been accepted that we were
not going to use Geronimo. I am quite happy with Geronimo if it is an option
especially after reading some of the arguments.

There could be several high level goals for the project. (We need such goals
agreed so we can make design decisions to achieve our desired trade-offs.)
Performance is a good high level goal and it can be defined to encompass
stability, scalability, and transaction response time. In any case we need a
few compatible goals not just one.

James deGraft-Johnson
Software Engineer - IT
Verizon Information Services
Tel:         (240) 456-7018
Fax:        (240) 456-7072
Mobile:   (240) 475-1444 <jdegraft@verizon-uc.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Fumitada Hattori [mailto:wolfgang127us@ybb.ne.jp]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 12:30 AM
To: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is the official name...


>Cheetah sounds good. Performance could be a primary
>design/implementation goal.

yeah, performance is important, but can it be really a primary goal of
EJB container ?
how about stability, integration...?

I guess more tough name is better, so I vote for GERONIMO !


--
Fumitada Hattori <wolfgang127us@ybb.ne.jp>



Mime
View raw message