geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Denes" <de...@ppgia.pucpr.br>
Subject RES: Dynamic proxies
Date Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:14:38 GMT
IMHO this is not a so huge mistake... If you think about the J2EE
architecture, one of the goals is to provide a set of business
components, which can be (ideally) integrated to create an application. 

When you have several ears in a server, one could argue that these ears
are different concerns about different features of the overall
application. The application is not the ear, but the interaction of the
several components that are in each ear file.

If you want to isolate components, you should create different server
configurations to isolate them.

Denes

> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Michael Remijan [mailto:remijan@ncsa.uiuc.edu]
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2003 12:43
> Para: geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org;
geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Assunto: Re: Dynamic proxies
> 
> JBoss redid their classloader for version 3 and it is very
> counter-intuitive.  Basically, unless you use a jboss specific config
> file,
> when you deploy an EAR it will share classes from other ears!  IMNSHO
this
> is a huge mistake.  The JBoss documentation says the classloaders were
> redesigned this way to more fully incorporate JMX.
> 


Mime
View raw message