Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB50200D42 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:30:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 1E43D160BFB; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 63124160BE6 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:30:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 82531 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2017 21:30:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@geode.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@geode.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@geode.apache.org Received: (qmail 82522 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2017 21:30:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:30:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3EE3B181B01 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:30:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QBaJMJM03k3Q for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id A90575FBB0 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E8D84E0877 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 57BCE240D2 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:30:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jinmei Liao (JIRA)" To: issues@geode.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (GEODE-3994) create async-event-queue command should fail if we are trying to create the queue with the same queueId but different attributes. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:30:06 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jinmei Liao updated GEODE-3994: ------------------------------- Description: create async-event-queue --id=queue --group=group1 --listener=xxx create async-event-queue --id=queue --group=group2 --listener=yyy Currently, if group1 and group2 have common members, the second command would fail partially, the queue is created on some member but not another, but the cluster configuration is updated already. Future server that might belong to both groups will have trouble creating the queue. It would be a good idea to check for unique queue name. Besides, they might give the same name with different listener, which will add to the confusion. was: create async-event-queue --id=queue --group=group1 --listener=xxx create async-event-queue --id=queue --group=group2 --listener=xxx Currently, if group1 and group2 have common members, the second command would fail partially, the queue is created on some member but not another, but the cluster configuration is updated already. Future server that might belong to both groups will have trouble creating the queue. It would be a good idea to check for unique queue name. Besides, they might give the same name with different listener, which will add to the confusion. > create async-event-queue command should fail if we are trying to create the queue with the same queueId but different attributes. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GEODE-3994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3994 > Project: Geode > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jinmei Liao > > create async-event-queue --id=queue --group=group1 --listener=xxx > create async-event-queue --id=queue --group=group2 --listener=yyy > Currently, if group1 and group2 have common members, the second command would fail partially, the queue is created on some member but not another, but the cluster configuration is updated already. Future server that might belong to both groups will have trouble creating the queue. It would be a good idea to check for unique queue name. Besides, they might give the same name with different listener, which will add to the confusion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)