geode-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (GEODE-3955) The gfsh 'describe region' command doesn't include asyncEventQueueIds or gatewaySenderIds
Date Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:37:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16271793#comment-16271793
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-3955:
---------------------------------------

PurelyApplied commented on a change in pull request #1099: GEODE-3955: Add AEQ and Gateway
Sender information to 'describe region' output.
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/1099#discussion_r153947571
 
 

 ##########
 File path: geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/cli/domain/RegionDescriptionJUnitTest.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,312 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license
+ * agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional information
regarding
+ * copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version
2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
a
+ * copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under
the License
+ * is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either
express
+ * or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
under
+ * the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.domain;
+
+import static org.apache.geode.cache.DataPolicy.NORMAL;
+import static org.apache.geode.cache.Scope.DISTRIBUTED_ACK;
+import static org.apache.geode.cache.Scope.LOCAL;
+import static org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.domain.RegionDescription.findCommon;
+import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.spy;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;
+
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.Map;
+
+import org.json.JSONObject;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.experimental.categories.Category;
+
+import org.apache.geode.management.cli.Result.Status;
+import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.commands.DescribeRegionCommand;
+import org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.result.CommandResult;
+import org.apache.geode.test.junit.categories.UnitTest;
+
+@Category(UnitTest.class)
+public class RegionDescriptionJUnitTest {
+  private static final String evictionKeyShared = "sharedEvictionKey";
+  private static final String partKeyShared = "sharedPartitionKey";
+  private static final String regKeyShared = "sharedRegionKey";
+  private static final String evictionValueShared = "sharedEvictionValue";
+  private static final String partValueShared = "sharedPartitionValue";
+  private static final String regValueShared = "sharedRegionValue";
+
+  private static final String evictionKeyA = "uniqueEvictionKey_A";
+  private static final String partKeyA = "uniquePartitionKey_A";
+  private static final String regKeyA = "uniqueRegionKey_A";
+  private static final String evictionValueA = "uniqueEvictionValue_A";
+  private static final String partValueA = "uniquePartitionValue_A";
+  private static final String regValueA = "uniqueRegionValue_A";
+
+  private static final String evictionKeyB = "uniqueEvictionKey_B";
+  private static final String partKeyB = "uniquePartitionKey_B";
+  private static final String regKeyB = "uniqueRegionKey_B";
+  private static final String evictionValueB = "uniqueEvictionValue_B";
+  private static final String partValueB = "uniquePartitionValue_B";
+  private static final String regValueB = "uniqueRegionValue_B";
+
+  public static final String regionName = "mockRegion1";
+
+  private static final DescribeRegionCommand command = spy(DescribeRegionCommand.class);
+
+  @Test
+  public void findCommonRemovesUnsharedKeys() {
+    Map<String, String> commonMap = new HashMap<>();
+    commonMap.put(evictionKeyShared, evictionValueShared);
+    commonMap.put(partKeyShared, partValueShared);
+    commonMap.put(regKeyShared, regValueShared);
+    commonMap.put(evictionKeyA, evictionValueA);
+    commonMap.put(partKeyA, partValueA);
+
+    Map<String, String> comparisonMap = new HashMap<>();
+    comparisonMap.put(evictionKeyShared, evictionValueShared);
+    comparisonMap.put(partKeyShared, partValueShared);
+    comparisonMap.put(regKeyShared, regValueShared);
+    commonMap.put(evictionKeyB, evictionValueB);
+    commonMap.put(regKeyA, regValueB);
+
+    findCommon(commonMap, comparisonMap);
+
+    assertThat(commonMap).containsOnlyKeys(evictionKeyShared, partKeyShared, regKeyShared);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void findCommonRemovesDisagreeingKeys() {
+    Map<String, String> commonMap = new HashMap<>();
+    commonMap.put(evictionKeyShared, evictionValueShared);
+    commonMap.put(partKeyShared, partValueA);
+    commonMap.put(regKeyShared, regValueA);
+
+    Map<String, String> comparisonMap = new HashMap<>();
+    comparisonMap.put(evictionKeyShared, evictionValueShared);
+    comparisonMap.put(partKeyShared, partValueB);
+    comparisonMap.put(regKeyShared, regValueB);
+
+    findCommon(commonMap, comparisonMap);
+
+    assertThat(commonMap).containsOnlyKeys(evictionKeyShared);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void findCommonRemovesDisagreeingKeysInvolvingNull() {
+    Map<String, String> commonMap = new HashMap<>();
+    commonMap.put(evictionKeyShared, evictionValueShared);
+    commonMap.put(partKeyShared, partValueA);
+    commonMap.put(regKeyShared, null);
+
+    Map<String, String> comparisonMap = new HashMap<>();
+    comparisonMap.put(evictionKeyShared, evictionValueShared);
+    comparisonMap.put(partKeyShared, null);
+    comparisonMap.put(regKeyShared, regValueB);
+
+    findCommon(commonMap, comparisonMap);
+
+    assertThat(commonMap).containsOnlyKeys(evictionKeyShared);
+  }
+
+
+  @Test
+  public void singleAddDefinesDescription() {
+    RegionDescriptionPerMember mockA = getMockRegionDescriptionPerMember_A();
+    RegionDescription description = new RegionDescription();
+    description.add(mockA);
+
+    assertThat(description.getCndEvictionAttributes())
+        .isEqualTo(mockA.getNonDefaultEvictionAttributes());
+    assertThat(description.getCndPartitionAttributes())
+        .isEqualTo(mockA.getNonDefaultPartitionAttributes());
+    assertThat(description.getCndRegionAttributes())
+        .isEqualTo(mockA.getNonDefaultRegionAttributes());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void multipleAddsMergeAsExpected() {
+    RegionDescriptionPerMember mockA = getMockRegionDescriptionPerMember_A();
+    RegionDescriptionPerMember mockB = getMockRegionDescriptionPerMember_B();
+    RegionDescription description = new RegionDescription();
+    description.add(mockA);
+    description.add(mockB);
+
+    Map<String, String> sharedEviction = new HashMap<>();
+    sharedEviction.put(evictionKeyShared, evictionValueShared);
+    Map<String, String> sharedRegion = new HashMap<>();
+    sharedRegion.put(regKeyShared, regValueShared);
+    Map<String, String> sharedPartition = new HashMap<>();
+    sharedPartition.put(partKeyShared, partValueShared);
+
+    assertThat(description.getCndEvictionAttributes()).isEqualTo(sharedEviction);
+    assertThat(description.getCndPartitionAttributes()).isEqualTo(sharedPartition);
+    assertThat(description.getCndRegionAttributes()).isEqualTo(sharedRegion);
+
+    assertThat(description.getRegionDescriptionPerMemberMap())
+        .containsOnlyKeys(mockA.getHostingMember(), mockB.getHostingMember())
+        .containsEntry(mockA.getHostingMember(), mockA)
+        .containsEntry(mockB.getHostingMember(), mockB);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void outOfScopeAddGetsIgnored() {
+    RegionDescriptionPerMember mockA = getMockRegionDescriptionPerMember_A();
+    RegionDescriptionPerMember mockB = getMockRegionDescriptionPerMember_OutOfScope();
+    RegionDescription description = new RegionDescription();
+    description.add(mockA);
+    description.add(mockB);
+
+    assertThat(description.getCndEvictionAttributes())
+        .isEqualTo(mockA.getNonDefaultEvictionAttributes());
+    assertThat(description.getCndPartitionAttributes())
+        .isEqualTo(mockA.getNonDefaultPartitionAttributes());
+    assertThat(description.getCndRegionAttributes())
+        .isEqualTo(mockA.getNonDefaultRegionAttributes());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void simpleDescribeRegionCommandConsumesRegionDescriptionAsExpected() {
+    RegionDescriptionPerMember mockDescPerMember = getMockRegionDescriptionPerMember_A();
+    RegionDescription regionDescription = new RegionDescription();
+    regionDescription.add(mockDescPerMember);
+    CommandResult commandResult =
+        (CommandResult) command.buildDescriptionResult(regionName, regionDescription);
+    assertThat(commandResult.getStatus()).isEqualTo(Status.OK);
+    // We can't assert that the "Non-Default Attributes Specific To The Hosting Members"
header is
+    // missing because Gfsh currently obfuscates portions of the underlying json that have
empty
+    // "content" fields. We'll have to dig into the JSON to verify.
+    JSONObject shared = getSharedAttributedJson(commandResult);
+    JSONObject unique = getMemberSpecificAttributeJson(commandResult);
+    assertThat(shared.toString()).contains(evictionKeyShared, partKeyShared, regKeyShared,
+        evictionValueShared, partValueShared, regValueShared, evictionKeyA, partKeyA, regKeyA,
+        evictionValueA, partValueA, regValueA);
+    assertThat(unique.toString()).isEqualTo("{}");
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void compoundDescribeRegionCommandConsumesRegionDescriptionAsExpected() {
+    RegionDescriptionPerMember mockDescPerMemberA = getMockRegionDescriptionPerMember_A();
+    RegionDescriptionPerMember mockDescPerMemberB = getMockRegionDescriptionPerMember_B();
+    RegionDescription regionDescription = new RegionDescription();
+    regionDescription.add(mockDescPerMemberA);
+    regionDescription.add(mockDescPerMemberB);
+    CommandResult commandResult =
+        (CommandResult) command.buildDescriptionResult(regionName, regionDescription);
+    assertThat(commandResult.getStatus()).isEqualTo(Status.OK);
+    // We can't assert that the "Non-Default Attributes Specific To The Hosting Members"
header is
+    // missing because Gfsh currently obfuscates portions of the underlying json that have
empty
+    // "content" fields. We'll have to dig into the JSON to verify.
+    JSONObject shared = getSharedAttributedJson(commandResult);
+    JSONObject unique = getMemberSpecificAttributeJson(commandResult);
+    assertThat(shared.toString()).contains(evictionKeyShared, partKeyShared, regKeyShared,
+        evictionValueShared, partValueShared, regValueShared);
+    assertThat(unique.toString()).contains(evictionKeyA, evictionValueA, partKeyA, partValueA,
+        regKeyA, regValueA, evictionKeyB, evictionValueB, partKeyB, partValueB, regKeyB,
regValueB);
+  }
+
+  private JSONObject getSharedAttributedJson(CommandResult commandResult) {
+    return commandResult.getContent().getInternalJsonObject().getJSONObject("__sections__-0")
+        .getJSONObject("__sections__-0").getJSONObject("__tables__-0").getJSONObject("content");
+  }
+
+  private JSONObject getMemberSpecificAttributeJson(CommandResult commandResult) {
 
 Review comment:
   I will add some logic to the `CommandResult` class to go digging into the structure, since
it seems to belong to that more than this class.  Unfortunately, I can't just use `getTableContent`
because the structure here is significantly different than in other commands, notably that
this commandResult has two `__section__-x` levels before the tables.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


> The gfsh 'describe region' command doesn't include asyncEventQueueIds or gatewaySenderIds
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-3955
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3955
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: management
>            Reporter: Barry Oglesby
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>         Attachments: geode-3955.diff
>
>
> The {{constructor}} and {{getNonDefaultAttributes}} methods in {{org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.domain.RegionAttributesInfo}}
class would have to be modified to include the {{asyncEventQueueIds}} and {{gatewaySenderIds}}.

> I did a quick modification of this class (attached).
> With these changes, 'describe region' looks like:
> {noformat}
> gfsh>describe region --name=/data
> ..........................................................
> Name            : data
> Data Policy     : partition
> Hosting Members : ln-1
> Non-Default Attributes Shared By Hosting Members  
>   Type    |         Name          | Value
> --------- | --------------------- | ---------
> Region    | data-policy           | PARTITION
>           | async-event-queue-ids | db
>           | size                  | 0
>           | gateway-sender-ids    | ny
> Partition | redundant-copies      | 1
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message