geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mario Ivanac <mario.iva...@est.tech>
Subject Odg: Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"
Date Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:00:44 GMT
Hi,

as described before:

This property will contain generic string, which will be added as Server Name Indication (SNI)
parameter to ClientHello message.
ClientHello message is part of SSL handshake.

Mario
________________________________
Šalje: Charlie Black <cblack@pivotal.io>
Poslano: 19. studenog 2019. 18:20
Prima: Mario Ivanac <mario.ivanac@est.tech>
Kopija: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org>
Predmet: Re: Odg: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

The SSL handshake is done before the Geode handshake.    So additions to the Geode handshake
protocol will not affect SSL connections since the secure socket connection has already been
negotiated and the Geode handshake is encrypted.

Charlie

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:06 AM Mario Ivanac <mario.ivanac@est.tech> wrote:
Hi all,

this proposal and ticket are result of mail discussion "Special certificates for multisite":

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2418dd1b5f9ae812daa48a51a8d2eb252a3c861a890264f47da3a4d3@%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.apache.org_thread.html_2418dd1b5f9ae812daa48a51a8d2eb252a3c861a890264f47da3a4d3-40-253Cdev.geode.apache.org-253E&d=DwMF-g&c=lnl9vOaLMzsy2niBC8-h_K-7QJuNJEsFrzdndhuJ3Sw&r=TeO8Y4MHxN-HWthX0kIhmTbHjxbnon-82BZ-g9Q6TDI&m=GG4kW5SuTjSCV707Igt5WbMQyay_8vOtB9nH8cLBgAM&s=PjLj2CJYNHbQUiMKrd-FKMqwbuxVERJifxQWpM4HM8k&e=>


BR,
Mario
________________________________
Šalje: Charlie Black <cblack@pivotal.io<mailto:cblack@pivotal.io>>
Poslano: 19. studenog 2019. 17:24
Prima: dev@geode.apache.org<mailto:dev@geode.apache.org> <dev@geode.apache.org<mailto:dev@geode.apache.org>>
Predmet: Re: Proposal of new config property "ssl-server-name-extension"

I have read the e-mail and the ticket I am not sure how this field is going
to be used.   Maybe you can expand on the intent of this field.

>From the property "ssl-server-name-extension" it feels like we are
intending to correlate with something presented in the SSL certificate.
It would be great if that was explained plainly for the reader in more
detail.

For now I can only -1.

Charlie

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 3:27 AM Mario Ivanac <mario.ivanac@est.tech> wrote:

> Hi geode dev,
>
> as a part of solution for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7414<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D7414&d=DwMF-g&c=lnl9vOaLMzsy2niBC8-h_K-7QJuNJEsFrzdndhuJ3Sw&r=TeO8Y4MHxN-HWthX0kIhmTbHjxbnon-82BZ-g9Q6TDI&m=GG4kW5SuTjSCV707Igt5WbMQyay_8vOtB9nH8cLBgAM&s=4h7HHiRlRX_Cw8mVGuVfzHgfUbKul07BjaV1CVE3_H8&e=>
> we would like to introduce new config property "ssl-server-name-extension".
>
> This property will contain generic string, which will be added as Server
> Name Indication (SNI) parameter to Client Hello message.
>
> Do you agree with this proposal?
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>


--
Charlie Black | cblack@pivotal.io<mailto:cblack@pivotal.io>


--
Charlie Black | cblack@pivotal.io<mailto:cblack@pivotal.io>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message