geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] GEODE-7241 - make Jar not War?
Date Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:32:48 GMT
Udo, 

Can you update GEODE-7241 to help us understand the reason why we need to publish geode-web*
WARs to maven?  I get that we used to do this but I can’t recall why we choose that approach.

There is one request for Pulse on maven (GEODE-6208).

Anthony


> On Sep 24, 2019, at 3:44 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <udo@apache.com> wrote:
> 
> Maybe the better question is, WHY are we publishing geode-web and geode-web-api.
> 
> Pulse, from what I remember, could be a standalone deployment. At least that is what
I remember.
> 
> Most likely an oversight...
> 
> --Udo
> 
> On 9/24/19 3:38 PM, Robert Houghton wrote:
>> The geode-pulse module also builds a war, but does not publish it. Is this
>> an oversight, or by design?
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 3:34 PM Robert Houghton <rhoughton@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I am working on the change to get the geode-web and geode-web-api war
>>> artifacts published instead of the jars. I have found the
>>> geode-web-management project is also producing a war artifact, in addition
>>> to a jar. Do we want it to be published as well? What is the criterion we
>>> use to decide?
>>> 
>>> I think this problem was an oversight from the changes PurelyApplied and I
>>> made to the build when we made the publish plugin 'opt-in' instead of
>>> forced by the root project. Easy to publish one or the other, but I am not
>>> qualified to decide whether a war or jar is more appropriate for these
>>> modules.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> -Robert
>>> 


Mime
View raw message