geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Owen Nichols <onich...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: Propose including GEODE-7085 in 1.10
Date Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:51:33 GMT
There appears to be consensus that this is a critical fix.

The following commits have been brought into support/1.10.0 <https://github.com/apache/geode/tree/release/1.10.0>
as the critical fix for GEODE-7085 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7085>:

git cherry-pick -x f58710116db1cd8c509b59a43ffa050a073234d7 <https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/f58710116db1cd8c509b59a43ffa050a073234d7>
git cherry-pick -x f17931bf541fc0255112f713931388d9ee0bbc30 <https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/f17931bf541fc0255112f713931388d9ee0bbc30>

GEODE-7085 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7085> has been marked as 'resolved
in' 1.10.0.

Regards,
-Owen


> On Aug 26, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Eric Shu <eshu@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:40 AM Alexander Murmann <amurmann@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> While it's not new, it's critical
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:38 AM Juan José Ramos <jramos@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:36 PM Dan Smith <dsmith@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to propose including the fixes for GEODE-7085 into 1.10 (SHA's
>>>> below). This is not a new issue, but it does result not being able to
>>>> recover from disk without this fix if a cluster has more than 2 billion
>>>> updates to a single bucket from a single member.
>>>> 
>>>> SHAs: f587101  ,  f17931bf
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Dan
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Juan José Ramos Cassella
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>> Email: jramos@pivotal.io
>>> 
>> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message