geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Process
Date Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:57:00 GMT
Following up on this, I took a stab at organizing our old proposals into
the buckets on the wiki. We now have:

Under Discussion - Draft and In Discussion proposals
In Development - proposals under active development
Active - Proposals that are completely implemented
Dropped - Proposals that were not approved or development stalled out.

If I moved your proposal to "Dropped" erroneously, please feel free to move
it back! I moved things there that did not appear to have been implemented
or have any recent activity.

I put a few things in "Unknown State." If you know what state these
proposals are in, please move them!

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:20 AM Alexander Murmann <ajmurmann@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Given discussion here and previous discussion on the PR, I consider this
> proposal approved and updated its state accordingly.
>
> I also incorporated Dan's suggestion of moving deprecated proposals and
> added a reference to the new process at the top of the Project Proposals
> and Specifications page
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications
> >
> .
>
> Thank you all for you great feedback throughout this process!
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:07 AM Dan Smith <dsmith@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Will moving the page around on the wiki result in dead links to the
> draft
> > > version?
> > >
> >
> > No. If you use the share button in the wiki, you get a permanent link to
> > the page. Even if you just copy the URL from the address bar it doesn't
> > include the folder the page is in.
> >
> > -Dan
> >
>
>
> --
> Alexander J. Murmann
> (650) 283-1933
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message