From dev-return-31308-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@geode.apache.org Mon Jun 24 23:15:20 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 47CF6180671 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:15:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 55730 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2019 23:15:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geode.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@geode.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geode.apache.org Received: (qmail 55719 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2019 23:15:19 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) (10.10.3.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:15:19 +0000 Received: from MacBook-Pro-5.local (50-203-225-134-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.203.225.134]) by mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 8CFD91C6F for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]: Improve OQL Method Invocation Security To: dev@geode.apache.org References: <3517C932-3940-40BB-B28A-704B7A326718@pivotal.io> <51B65E0B-5494-4E30-BF0B-3A06D8A9C3A6@pivotal.io> From: Udo Kohlmeyer Message-ID: <1569a4d3-bbfe-a043-0130-26253678d989@apache.org> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:15:14 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US +1, Count me in On 6/24/19 13:06, Juan José Ramos wrote: > Hey Jake, > > Sure, I guess we could do a live session if there's enough interest after > people have reviewed the proposal. > Best regards. > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 4:17 PM Jacob Barrett wrote: > >> >>> On Jun 24, 2019, at 11:49 AM, Juan José Ramos wrote: >>> >>> I’d rather get feedback in any way and aggregate everything on my own >> than >>> maybe not getting anything because I'm explicitly limiting the options to >>> provide it. >> Dealers choice so both it is! >> >> Could you also consider public live session on some medium, like Zoom, >> where you can walk through the proposal and take like feedback and >> questions? >> >> Thanks, >> Jake >> >> >>