geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Murmann <amurm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Process
Date Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:37:21 GMT
> it might be nice to have separate subdirectories on the wiki for the
different proposal states, to easily see what state the proposals are in.

I think that's useful. I wonder if it would make sense though to bucket
some of these. Maybe we could make do with just a "current" and "old"
directory. I like hiding RFCs that are no longer relevant, but don't care
much if they are dropped or superseded. Likewise, I don't care much if they
are active, under discussion or under development. Thoughts?

> One thing that isn't visible in these states - is the proposal actively
under development?  It might be nice to clearly distinguish between
proposals that are under development vs. finished.

Just to make sure I got this 100% right, you mean the work related as part
of the proposal would be under development, correct?

On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:30 PM Dan Smith <dsmith@pivotal.io> wrote:

> +1
>
> Looks good to me!
>
> A couple of minor thoughts - it might be nice to have separate
> subdirectories on the wiki for the different proposal states, to easily see
> what state the proposals are in.
>
> One thing that isn't visible in these states - is the proposal actively
> under development?  It might be nice to clearly distinguish between
> proposals that are under development vs. finished.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:31 PM Alexander Murmann <amurmann@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Having the RFC discussion in a pull request was by far the most
>> controversial aspect of this proposal. Because we were unable to come to
>> an
>> agreement, we should stick with the smallest change to what we are doing
>> already. Therefore I moved the proposal to the wiki where all existing
>> proposals are.
>>
>> Please take a look there
>> <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Lightweight+RFC+Process
>> >
>> and let's discuss here if any changes should be made. Otherwise I intent
>> to
>> move the proposal to `active` tomorrow.
>>
>> Thank you everyone!
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:26 PM Alexander Murmann <amurmann@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I am proposing a new process that is aimed to address some of the issues
>> > we've recently encountered in making collective decisions. The process
>> I am
>> > proposing would use pull request to discuss proposals.
>> >
>> > To demonstrate the process, I submitted my proposal as a pull request
>> > <https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3706>. While this email has the
>> > [DISCUSS] label, I ask to *please keep all discussions on the PR
>> > <https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3706>* to test drive the proposed
>> > process. There already is a healthy discussion on the PR, including if
>> the
>> > process in general should take place via a PR.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message