geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jared Stewart <stewart.ja...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is the documentation wrong here?
Date Tue, 04 Jun 2019 16:29:15 GMT
Yes, I believe the docs there are out of date and need to be updated.  This
change in the naming of deployed jars was introduced in Geode 1.2 by
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/429.

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:27 AM liyuj <18624049226@163.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> https://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/19/configuring/cluster_config/deploying_application_jars.html
>
> This document has such a paragraph:
>
>
>     Versioning of JAR Files
>
> When you deploy JAR files to a cluster or member group, the JAR file is
> modified to indicate version information in its name. Each JAR filename
> is prefixed with|vf.gf#|and <http://vf.gf#%7Cand> contains a version
> number at the end of the
> filename. For example, if you deploy|MyClasses.jar|five times, the
> filename is displayed as|vf.gf#MyClasses.jar#5|when
> <http://vf.gf#MyClasses.jar%235%7Cwhen> you list all
> deployed jars.
>
> but,in my environment, it is shown as follows:
>
> gfsh>list deployed
> Member  |      JAR       | JAR Location
> ------- | -------------- |
> ---------------------------------------------------
> server1 | ra.jar         | /media/liyujue/data/geode/server1/ra.v1.jar
> server1 | mx4j-3.0.2.jar |
> /media/liyujue/data/geode/server1/mx4j-3.0.2.v1.jar
> server2 | ra.jar         | /media/liyujue/data/geode/server2/ra.v1.jar
> server2 | mx4j-3.0.2.jar |
> /media/liyujue/data/geode/server2/mx4j-3.0.2.v1.jar
>
> Is the documentation wrong here?
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message