geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Smith <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] TTL setting on WAN
Date Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:15:57 GMT
> 2) The developer wants to replicate _state_.  This means that implicit
> state changes (expiration or eviction w/ destroy) could allow us to
> optimize the queue size.  This is very similar to conflation, just a
> different kind of optimization.
> For this second case, does it make sense to allow the user to specify a
> different TTL than the underlying region?  It seems like what the user
> wants is to not replicate stale data and having an extra TTL attribute
> would just be another value to mis-configure.  What do you think about just
> providing a boolean flag?
This kinda jogged my memory. AsyncEventQueues actually *do* have a boolean
flag to allow you to forward expiration events to the queue. I have no idea
how this interacts with conflation though -

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message