geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: geode-all-bom-1.9.0.jar
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:31:17 GMT
Comments below...

> On Mar 26, 2019, at 5:09 PM, Robert Houghton <rhoughton@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> A) Geode-all-bom contains the dependency versions for our projects.

Got it.  I think I’m confused by the name.  I expected that a ‘geode-all-bom’ would
get me all the geode bits not just a list of dependency versions.  What if we rename this
to something like ‘geode-dependency-bom’?

> B) maybe not needed, since the dependencies nate already present…

I think it would be better to not create and publish empty jar files for BOM’s.

> 
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 16:09 Anthony Baker <abaker@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
>> I’m curious:
>> 
>> - Why do all subprojects declare a dependency on
>> project(':boms:geode-all-bom’)) ?
>> - Why are we shipping geode-all-bom-1.9.0.jar in the lib/ dir and in our
>> war files?
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Anthony
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message