geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Bretl <mbr...@apache.org>
Subject [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache Geode 1.7.0 RC1
Date Fri, 28 Sep 2018 18:47:38 GMT
Officially canceling vote for mail archive.

--Mark

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 8:54 PM Nabarun Nag <nnag@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for sharing your finding with the community and doing the needful to
> resolve the issue. I will be cherry-picking the resolution to the release
> branch and start with the process of create a new release candidate.
>
> Hello Geode community,
>
> We are terminating all tasks related to RC1 for Apache Geode 1.7.0. Please
> stay tuned for the next release candidate.
>
> Regards
> Nabarun Nag
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:41 PM Jason Huynh <jhuynh@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > Hi Nabarun,
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for delaying the vote, after investigating, it looks like we may
> > have increased our chances of WAN inconsistency in a specific scenario.
> > After trying this same app on previous releases, I was able to pinpoint
> > which checkin started to amplify the problem and increase the number of
> > scenarios this inconsistency can occur.
> >
> >
> > The ticket in question is GEODE-3967, the problem with this checkin is
> that
> > we try to enqueue wan events in a catch block for
> > ConcurrentCacheModificationExceptions.  We end up enqueueing these “old”
> > events (which can now be considered out of order) and then get
> transmitted
> > to the other WAN site and leaves the sites inconsistent with each other.
> >
> >
> > I’ve reverted the commit for GEODE-3967 on develop if you want to pull
> this
> > into the release.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 12:23 PM Nabarun Nag <nnag@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jason,
> > >
> > > We can wait until the investigation is completed, as this can be a
> > > potential -1 to the RC.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Nabarun Nag
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 12:20 PM Jason Huynh <jhuynh@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm currently looking into an issue in WAN when running this rc.  Not
> > > sure
> > > > if it's a showstopper and I can't actually describe what the problem
> > is,
> > > > but a sample application I have is not behaving the same as before,
> > there
> > > > may be a data inconsistency... if it's not too late, would you be
> able
> > to
> > > > extend the vote?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:47 AM Dave Barnes <dbarnes@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +0
> > > > > Recasting my vote, just for full disclosure. I found a (very minor)
> > > > problem
> > > > > in the source release doc files: If a user builds their own docs
> from
> > > > > sources, they'll say version 1.8.
> > > > >
> > > > >    - NOT (even close to) a showstopper
> > > > >    - This will NOT affect the User Guide we'll push to the website
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > >    release, which will be correctly labeled 1.7
> > > > >    - Javadocs are NOT affected - they are correctly versioned as
> 1.7
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Sai Boorlagadda <
> > > > > sai.boorlagadda@gmail.com
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * verified commit hash
> > > > > > * checked concourse pipeline is green
> > > > > > * ran examples with RC1
> > > > > > * built from source
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sai
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 8:46 AM Nabarun Nag <nnag@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > REMINDER: VOTE deadline is today (EOD 19th September 2018
PDT)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > Nabarun Nag
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:13 AM Anthony Baker <
> abaker@pivotal.io
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think we can get rid of the **/out/** exclusion
in the
> build
> > > > > script,
> > > > > > > > let’s do that for the next release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Anthony
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Dan Smith <dsmith@pivotal.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +0
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I noticed that someone added some files called
"out" to the
> > > repo
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > aren't included in the source distribution:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ./ci/resource-types/gce-instances-resource/out
> > > > > > > > > ./ci/resource-types/concourse-metadata-resource/files/out
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > These aren't included in the source distribution
because we
> > are
> > > > > > > > explicitly
> > > > > > > > > excluding anything called "out." Presumably we
thought
> > anything
> > > > > > called
> > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > is an output directory ("out" is also in .gitignore).
So
> the
> > ci
> > > > > > > directory
> > > > > > > > > in the source distribution is incomplete. But
maybe that
> > > doesn't
> > > > > > matter
> > > > > > > > > because it is just CI configuration?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Everything else looks good.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Dan
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Nabarun Nag
<
> > nnag@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> *DEADLINE :* Kindly complete your vote by
Wednesday, 19th
> > > > > September
> > > > > > > > 2018.
> > > > > > > > >> End of day PDT.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Following checks completed:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> - checked signatures
> > > > > > > > >> - checked sha’s
> > > > > > > > >> - builds from source
> > > > > > > > >> - run gfsh - start locator, server - create
region - do
> put
> > > and
> > > > > get
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > >> execute OQL query
> > > > > > > > >> - examples run cleanly
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> @John Blum <jblum@pivotal.io> , I was
looking into the
> mail
> > > > chain
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > >> Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC and I saw that you
had some concerns
> > > > > regarding
> > > > > > > SD
> > > > > > > > >> Geode's behavior with the changes made to
Log4j in Apache
> > > Geode.
> > > > > In
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > >> release, too we have made some upgrades to
log4j and we
> > would
> > > to
> > > > > > hear
> > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > >> feedback / get a green light on these changes.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Regards
> > > > > > > > >> Nabarun Nag
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:50 PM Nabarun Nag
<
> > nnag@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> Correction :
> > > > > > > > >>> Please note that we are voting upon the
source tags:
> > > > > rel/v1.7.0.RC1
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:49 PM Nabarun
Nag <
> > nnag@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first release candidate
for Apache Geode,
> > > version
> > > > > > 1.7.0.
> > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks to all the community members
for their
> > contributions
> > > to
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > >>>> release!
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Please do review and give your feedback.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> It resolves 351 issues on Apache
Geode JIRA system.
> > Release
> > > > > notes
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > >>>> found at:
> > > > > > > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/
> > > > > > > > >>>> Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-1.7.0
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Please note that we are voting upon
the source tags:
> > > > > > rel/v1.6.0.RC1
> > > > > > > > >>>> Apache Geode:
> > > > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/geode/tree/rel/v1.7.0.RC1
> > > > > > > > >>>> Apache Geode examples:
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > https://github.com/apache/geode-examples/tree/rel/v1.7.0.RC1
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Commit ID:
> > > > > > > > >>>> Apache Geode:
> > > > > > > > >>>> f9abdeb489c9278f96afd37f72a7a9d14cb0f154
> > > > > > > > >>>> Apache Geode Examples:
> > > > > > > > >>>> 9dca29c7c10fa8d44abc893271420476cfc0808f
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Source and binary files:
> > > > > > > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.7.0.RC1/
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Maven staging repo:
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1042
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Geode's KEYS file containing PGP
keys we use to sign the
> > > > > release:
> > > > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/geode/blob/develop/KEYS
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Signed the release with fingerprint:
> > > > > > > > >>>> rsa4096 2018-01-04 [SC] [expires:
2022-01-04]
> > > > > > > > >>>> CE6CD0A89480B1B9FCB98699274C66710770C135
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> rsa4096 2018-01-04 [SC] [expires:
2022-01-04]
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> I do apologize if there was an oversight.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Regards
> > > > > > > > >>>> Nabarun Nag
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message