geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anilkumar Gingade <aging...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2
Date Thu, 05 Apr 2018 17:15:00 GMT
Sounds like its suggestion to improve the process...I feel that should be
discussed in different thread; not part of release voting.

-Anil.


On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Jared Stewart <stewart.jared@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Out of curiosity, what was Pulkit's suggestion? I don't see it in this
> thread.
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 8:32 AM Alexander Murmann <amurmann@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > I am very much in favor of Pulkit's suggestion. We've previously
> discussed
> > using something like
> > https://github.com/nebula-plugins/gradle-dependency-lock-plugin. This
> > would
> > make a process like Pulkit describes very easy. We could easily be on the
> > latest versions that are known to work and at the same time capture which
> > dependencies cannot easily be upgraded. This would safe lots of manual
> work
> > and also provide greater transparency to us into where actual human
> effort
> > is required to get back catch up with latest.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Anthony Baker <abaker@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > > I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-5001 for this.
> > >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Apr 4, 2018, at 5:39 PM, John Blum <jblum@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Apache Geode *Log4j* dependency version *2.8.2* is or will cause
> > > > significant issues for apps, and in particular *Spring Boot* 2.0
> apps.
> > > >
> > > > This Geode Log4j version is already quite dated as *Log4j 2.11.0* is
> > now
> > > > already available [1] and *Spring Boot* 2.0 pulls in *Log4j 2.10.0*
> > [2].
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message