geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] GEODE-3617 Replace gemfire prefix with geode
Date Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:35:22 GMT
That's a bigger change and I'm not sure how you would handle backwards
compatibility for users using gemfire.properties.

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarrett@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Or better yet, we stop using properties files already.
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:55 AM Dave Barnes <dbarnes@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > Is there a possibility that the code might find its way into additional
> > contexts with other names? If so, perhaps we should consider a more
> generic
> > identifier, such as PRODUCT_PREFIX.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Dinesh Akhand <dineshak@amdocs.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Why we are keeping gemfire in current geode 1.2 , Can we replace this
> > with
> > > GEODE
> > > File : DistributionConfig.java
> > >
> > > Current code:
> > >   String GEMFIRE_PREFIX = "gemfire.";
> > >
> > > Suggestion to change:
> > >  String GEODE_PREFIX = "geode.";
> > >
> > > Why do you think ?
> > > Can we go ahead  and change this ?
> > > It will impact lots of files & all configuration will be now using with
> > > geode.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dinesh Akhand
> > > This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
> > > confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
> > >
> > > you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer <
> > > https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message