Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geode.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geode.apache.org
From: Anthony Baker <abaker@pivotal.io>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:56:54 -0700
References: <CA+ULb+vP0ViWH4Nc=4eaXvbT0KOmeFtQzp4eAa3p0fKPP7c8gw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJrNg026AeckEZ3YrwUZ3bwErsQgxCGpbyHwCxs8y9qvpFdskQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFh+7k11Ny975Tt+rOfqOxSap=Fx69==W1mjQdbtmn6UqmXMDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+OE_e1hkRrFAM=7AxiW4_W1W76nQP_C18BFdhcuqKoK4R6Wqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@geode.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+OE_e1hkRrFAM=7AxiW4_W1W76nQP_C18BFdhcuqKoK4R6Wqg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <0905B01A-D918-4ADD-AB3E-94A7515F7711@pivotal.io>
archived-at: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 19:57:03 -0000

+1

> On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mark Bretl <asf.mbretl@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> +1 for Gitbox
>=20
> I have been watching threads on INFRA list and been waiting to see =
when a
> good time would be to introduce the idea to the community. The Gitbox
> project has been going since the end of 2016 and looks as though it =
might
> be ready now as INFRA has begun moving some of their repositories to
> GitHub. We still need to 'apply' by submitting a ticket to INFRA and =
wait
> for approval, INFRA could still deny the move.
>=20
> Advantages:
> - GitHub PRs are fully functional (something which stopped us earlier)
> - Provides ability to align committer and non-committer workflows
> - Removing mirror from Git at Apache to GitHub and thus removing delay =
in
> sync
>=20
> Disadvantages:
> - Permission mapping is configured on id.apache.org (need to set =
GitHub ID)
>=20
> I can't think of many disadvantages to moving to GitBox.
>=20
> --Mark
>=20
>=20
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Dan Smith <dsmith@pivotal.io> wrote:
>=20
>> I'm in favor of switching to gitbox. We're already getting pretty =
much all
>> contributions from non-committers coming in as pull requests so we =
might as
>> well make it easier for us to manage things in github.
>>=20
>> -Dan
>>=20
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kirk Lund <klund@apache.org> wrote:
>>=20
>>> One thing that's given me trouble is that the mirroring of ASF git =
(for
>>> Apache Geode) to github can have a lengthy delay. In other words, =
after I
>>> commit to ASF git, it's not uncommon for my commit to not show up in =
the
>>> GitHub mirror right away and I've seen this delay take an hour.
>>>=20
>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik =
<roman@shaposhnik.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Hi!
>>>>=20
>>>> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF
>>>> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being
>>>> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite
>>>> some time.
>>>>=20
>>>> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W
>>>> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently
>>>> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf
>>>>=20
>>>> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much,
>>>> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once
>>>> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't
>>>> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox.
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Roman.
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20